© 1993 by British Society for the Philosophy of Science
Discussions |
Jennings and Zande Logic: A Note
Hyattsville Maryland USA
In ‘Zande Logic and Western Logic’ Richard Jennings argues that contrary to the view of Evans-Pritchard and Tim Triplett the system of logic employed by the Azande is sui generis and distinct from that of Westerners. I argue that this thesis is erroneous because Jennings, following Evans-Pritchard, is at fault in his analysis of the logic of the Azande. Zande thinking on the topic of witchcraft-substance heritability is not contradictory as believed. But even if one assumes that the Azande do reason contradictorily on matters of institutional importance, Jennings' thesis on the possibility of incompatible logics still fails because similar instances of contradictory thinking could be found in the West. Although in practical matters all peoples appeal to orthodox logic, in matters of institutional importance the epistemological relativist could be on fertile ground where orthodox logic is in conflict with beliefs that are institutionally grounded.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  B. Dov Lerner Winch and Instrumental Pluralism: A Response to My Critics Philosophy of the Social Sciences, June 1, 1998; 28(2): 312 - 320. [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. Slezak A Second Look at David Bloor's: Knowledge and Social Imagery Philosophy of the Social Sciences, September 1, 1994; 24(3): 336 - 361. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|