© 2002 by British Society for the Philosophy of Science
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Relationalism Rehabilitated? I: Classical Mechanics
1 Exeter College, Oxford OX1 3DP, UK. oliver.pooley{at}philosophy.oxford.ac.uk 2 Faculty of Philosophy, University of Oxford, 10 Merton Street, Oxford OX1 4JJ, UK. harvey.brown{at}philosophy.oxford.ac.uk
The implications for the substantivalistrelationalist controversy of Barbour and Bertotti's successful implementation of a Machian approach to dynamics are investigated. It is argued that in the context of Newtonian mechanics, the Machian framework provides a genuinely relational interpretation of dynamics and that it is more explanatory than the conventional, substantival interpretation. In a companion paper (Pooley [2002a]), the viability of the Machian framework as an interpretation of relativistic physics is explored.
1 Introduction
2 Newton versus Leibniz
3 Absolute space versus an affine connection
4 Anti-relationalist arguments
5 Rehabilitating relationalism
6 Dynamics on the relative configuration space
7 Intrinsic particle dynamics
8 Conclusion
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
B. Skow Sklar's Maneuver Brit J Philos Sci, December 1, 2007; 58(4): 777 - 786. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
