© 2004 by British Society for the Philosophy of Science
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Some Considerations on Conditional Chances
Corcoran Department of Philosophy, 512 Cabell Hall, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia 22904-4780, USA pwh2a{at}virginia.edu
Four interpretations of single-case conditional propensities are described and it is shown that for each a version of what has been called Humphreys' Paradox remains, despite the clarifying work of Gillies, McCurdy and Miller. This entails that propensities cannot be a satisfactory interpretation of standard probability theory.
- Introduction
- The basic issue
- The formal paradox
- Values of conditional propensities
- Interpretations of propensities
- McCurdy's response
- Miller's response
- Other possibilities
- 8.1 Temporal evolution
- 8.2 Renormalization
- 8.3 Causal influence
- 8.2 Renormalization
- 8.1 Temporal evolution
- Propensities to generate frequencies
- Conclusion