| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Causal Powers
Department of Philosophy, 541 Hall of Languages, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY 13210, USA, edhiddle{at}syr.edu
Nancy Cartwright offers an account of causal powers, and argues that it explains some important general features of scientific method. Patricia Cheng argues that this theory is superior as a psychological theory of learning to standard models of conditioning. I extend and develop the theory, and argue that it provides the best explanation of a number of problem cases for philosophical theories of causation, including preemption, overdetermination and puzzles about transitivity.
- Hitchcock and Halpern & Pearl on actual causes
- Problems and morals
- 2.1 Puzzles about prevention
- 2.2 Counterfactuals
- 2.2 Counterfactuals
- 2.1 Puzzles about prevention
- Causal powers
- 3.1 Generative causal power
- 3.2 Preventative causal power
- 3.2 Preventative causal power
- 3.1 Generative causal power
- Net and component powers
- Actual or successful causes
- Solutions to puzzle cases
- Conclusion
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. Hitchcock Prevention, Preemption, and the Principle of Sufficient Reason Philosophical Review, October 1, 2007; 116(4): 495 - 532. [PDF] |
||||
