Skip Navigation


The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science Advance Access originally published online on July 31, 2007
The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 2007 58(3):387-408; doi:10.1093/bjps/axm028
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
58/3/387    most recent
axm028v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Grinbaum, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Copyright © The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of British Society for the Philosophy of Science.

Reconstruction of Quantum Theory

Alexei Grinbaum

CEA-Saclay, SPEC/LARSIM, 91191 Gif-sur-Yvette Cedex, France

alexei.grinbaum{at}cea.fr


   Abstract

What belongs to quantum theory is no more than what is needed for its derivation. Keeping to this maxim, we record a paradigmatic shift in the foundations of quantum mechanics, where the focus has recently moved from interpreting to reconstructing quantum theory. Several historic and contemporary reconstructions are analyzed, including the work of Hardy, Rovelli, and Clifton, Bub and Halvorson. We conclude by discussing the importance of a novel concept of intentionally incomplete reconstruction.

1 What is Wrong with Interpreting Quantum Mechanics
2 Reconstruction of Physical Theory
2.1 Schema
2.2 Selection of the first principles
2.3 Status of the first principles

3 Examples of Reconstruction
3.1 Early examples of reconstruction
3.2 Hardy's reconstruction
3.3 Rovelli's reconstruction
3.4 The CBH reconstruction
3.5 Intentionally incomplete reconstructions

4 Conclusion


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br J Philos SciHome page
M. J. Brown
Relational Quantum Mechanics and the Determinacy Problem
Brit J Philos Sci, December 1, 2009; 60(4): 679 - 695.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.