The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science Advance Access originally published online on July 31, 2007
The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 2007 58(3):595-604; doi:10.1093/bjps/axm027
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Is Standard Quantum Mechanics Technologically Inadequate?
Faculty of Philosophy, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Burg. Oudlaan 50, 3062 PA Rotterdam, The Netherlands
Department of Physics & Astronomy, Utrecht University, Princetonplein 5, 3584 CC Utrecht, The Netherlands
Department of Physics & Astronomy, Utrecht University, Princetonplein 5, 3584 CC Utrecht, The Netherlands
f.a.muller{at}fwb.eur.nl
f.a.muller{at}phys.uu.nl
m.p.seevinck{at}phys.uu.nl
| Abstract |
|---|
In a recent issue of this journal, P.E. Vermaas ([2005]) claims to have demonstrated that standard quantum mechanics is technologically inadequate in that it violates the technical functions condition. We argue that this claim is false because based on a narrow interpretation of this technical functions condition that Vermaas can only accept on pain of contradiction. We also argue that if, in order to avoid this contradiction, the technical functions condition is interpreted widely rather than narrowly, then Vermaas, argument for his claim collapses. The conclusion is that Vermaas' claim that standard quantum mechanics is technologically inadequate evaporates.
- 1 Introduction
- 2 The Narrow Interpretation
- 3 The Wide Interpretation
- 4 The Teleportation Scheme
- 5 Conclusions
- 2 The Narrow Interpretation