The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science Advance Access published online on June 18, 2009
The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, doi:10.1093/bjps/axp022
Explanatory Independence and Epistemic Interdependence: A Case Study of the Optimality Approach
Department of Philosophy, 246 Murray Hall, Oklahoma State University Stillwater, OK 74078, USA
angela.potochnik{at}okstate.edu
| Abstract |
|---|
The value of optimality modeling has long been a source of contention amongst population biologists. Here I present a view of the optimality approach as at once playing a crucial explanatory role and yet also depending on external sources of confirmation. Optimality models are not alone in facing this tension between their explanatory value and their dependence on other approaches; I suspect that the scenario is quite common in science. This investigation of the optimality approach thus serves as a case study, on the basis of which I suggest that there is a widely felt tension in science between explanatory independence and broad epistemic interdependence, and that this tension influences scientific methodology.
- Introduction
- 1.1 The optimality approach and its detractors
- 1.2 The optimality approach and antireductionism
- 1.2 The optimality approach and antireductionism
- 1.1 The optimality approach and its detractors
- Explanatory Independence
- 2.1 Optimality explanations
- 2.2 Causal patterns and context of inquiry
- 2.2 Causal patterns and context of inquiry
- 2.1 Optimality explanations
- Epistemic Interdependence
- 3.1 What optimality models overlook
- 3.2 Mutual epistemic dependence
- 3.2 Mutual epistemic dependence
- 3.1 What optimality models overlook
- Balancing Independence and Interdependence