© 2001 by British Society for the Philosophy of Science
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The Poverty of the Stimulus Argument
1 Department of Philosophy, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TN, UK. S.Laurence@sheffield.ac.uk 2 Department of PhilosophyMS 14, Rice University, PO Box 1892, Houston, TX 772511892, USA. Margolis@ruf.rice.edu
Noam Chomsky's Poverty of the Stimulus Argument is one of the most famous and controversial arguments in the study of language and the mind. Though widely endorsed by linguists, the argument has met with much resistance in philosophy. Unfortunately, philosophical critics have often failed to fully appreciate the power of the argument. In this paper, we provide a systematic presentation of the Poverty of the Stimulus Argument, clarifying its structure, content, and evidential base. We defend the argument against a variety of philosophical criticisms, new and old, and argue that the Poverty of the Stimulus Argument continues to deserve its guiding role in the study of language and the mind.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. R. Gregg Taking a social turn for the worse: The language socialization paradigm for second language acquisition Second Language Research, October 1, 2006; 22(4): 413 - 442. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. R. Gregg The state of emergentism in second language acquisition Second Language Research, April 1, 2003; 19(2): 95 - 128. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
