Skip Navigation

The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 2004 55(4):615-643; doi:10.1093/bjps/55.4.615
© 2004 by British Society for the Philosophy of Science
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Meehl, P. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Cliometric Metatheory III: Peircean Consensus, Verisimilitude and Asymptotic Method

Paul E. Meehl §

Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455-0344, USA  *

Statistical procedures can be applied to episodes in the history of science in order to weight attributes to predict short-term survival of theories; an asymptotic method is used to show that short-term survival is a valid proxy for ultimate survival; and a theoretical argument is made that ultimate survival is a valid proxy for objective truth. While realists will appreciate this last step, instrumentalists do not need it to benefit from the actuarial procedures of cliometric metatheory.

  1. Introduction
  2. A plausible proxy for Peircean consensus
  3. Assessing the validity of theory attributes as predictors of theory survival
    3.1 Linear discriminant function
    3.2 Factor analysis
    3.3 Taxometric analysis

  4. Verisimilitude index
  5. Satisfying both instrumentalists and realists
  6. Recapitulation
  7. Implementation of cliometric metatheory

* Correspondence about this article may be addressed to Leslie Yonce at pemeehle{at}umn.edu

§ This article had been completed by Paul Meehl at the time of his death on 14 February 2003. His wife, Leslie J. Yonce, is grateful to Keith Gunderson (University of Minnesota, Center for Philosophy of Science) and Niels G. Waller (Psychology Department, Vanderbilt University) for advice with some final editing details.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.