The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science Advance Access published online on February 1, 2006
The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, doi:10.1093/bjps/axi158
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Department of Logic and Philosophy of Science, University of California Irvine, 5100 Social Science Plaza Irvine, CA 92697-5100 USA
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. In earlier work I have argued that the most substantial threat to scientific realism arises from the problem of unconceived alternatives: the repeated failure of past scientists and scientific communities to conceive of alternatives to extant scientific theories, even when such alternatives were both (1) well confirmed by the evidence available at the time and (2) sufficiently scientifically serious as to be later embraced by actual scientific communities. In this paper I explore Charles Darwin's development and defense of his pangenesis theory of inheritance and conclude that this particular historical example offers impressive support for the challenge posed to realism by this problem of unconceived alternatives. 1 Introduction 2 Darwin and pangenesis: The search for the material basis of generation and heredity 3 A crucial unconceived alternative: common-cause mechanisms of inheritance 4 Galton and common-cause inheritance 5 Conclusion
Article
Darwin's Pangenesis and the Problem of Unconceived Alternatives1
P. Kyle Stanford 1 *
P. Kyle Stanford, E-mail: stanford{at}uci.edu
![]()
Abstract
1From Exceeding Our Grasp: Science, History, and the Problem of Unconceived Alternatives by P. Kyle Stanford. Copyright © 2006 by Oxford University Press, Inc. Used by permission of Oxford University Press, Inc.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?